Apr 24. 4 Notes.
Apr 24. 3 Notes.

fuckdanielmaitland:

Autistic artist Stephen Wiltshire draws spellbinding 18ft picture of New York from memory… after a 20-minute helicopter ride over city.

(via jojopuff)

This vector project is still unfinished.  In fact, I haven’t opened Illustrator in what seems to be more than a year.  :/

Aug 03. 10 Notes.
acrylic painting in my moleskine.
also, for more of my art/photos: http://andagain.tumblr.com

acrylic painting in my moleskine.

also, for more of my art/photos: http://andagain.tumblr.com

Apr 24. 5 Notes.
i find these glass heads so much more interesting than the hats they advertise.

i find these glass heads so much more interesting than the hats they advertise.

Apr 22. 2 Notes.
progression 3

progression 3

Mar 18. 7 Notes.
progression #2

progression #2

Mar 16. 4 Notes.
starting a new vector, let’s see if i actually finish it this time :o

starting a new vector, let’s see if i actually finish it this time :o

Mar 16. 3 Notes.
btvsandatsloves:

Another Spuffy Desktop
(Found the graphic, added effects.)

I get that you don’t mean any harm by doing this because you’re very clear in all your posts about what is yours and what isn’t, but in the world of graphic art, this is unacceptable.  Unless something is a stock image or a resource or a raw screencap or you get explicit permission from the original graphic artist, taking somebody’s art, slapping a few effects on it, and distributing it is not cool.  At the very least, you need to credit the artist, not just discredit yourself.
I’m not trying to be mean, I’m just trying to let you know before you have a disgruntled graphic artist that you’ve “borrowed” from demanding that you take these images down.  Some people don’t care, some people do.  It’s just that generally this is, you know, not good.

btvsandatsloves:

Another Spuffy Desktop

(Found the graphic, added effects.)

I get that you don’t mean any harm by doing this because you’re very clear in all your posts about what is yours and what isn’t, but in the world of graphic art, this is unacceptable.  Unless something is a stock image or a resource or a raw screencap or you get explicit permission from the original graphic artist, taking somebody’s art, slapping a few effects on it, and distributing it is not cool.  At the very least, you need to credit the artist, not just discredit yourself.

I’m not trying to be mean, I’m just trying to let you know before you have a disgruntled graphic artist that you’ve “borrowed” from demanding that you take these images down.  Some people don’t care, some people do.  It’s just that generally this is, you know, not good.

(via btvsandatsloves-deactivated2011)

Feb 27. 6 Notes.
next »